Tag Archives: Getting published

The audience is out there

It’s been a while since I wrote my Twitter profile (go on, read it), but it’s one I’m still quite happy with, at least until this week, when a perceptive follower (thanks Derek!) asked what the ‘breakthrough moment’ it mentions would actually look like to me.  My first reaction was to reply ‘a book deal’ because isn’t that what I’ve wanted since starting my first novel in 2003? Isn’t that what any writer of full-length fiction really really wants?

But hang on  a minute. That ambition was born eight years ago. In that time I’ve written a lot, learned a lot and changed my work status more than once. Then there are the changes sweeping through the publishing industry. Maybe it’s time to take another look at the Holy Grail of the novelist and see if it’s still measuring up.

A book deal, if you ask me, gets its cachet of ultimate accolade on two counts.
The first is recognition, the second recompense. Recognition, that is, of my
work, beyond my personal circle or group of peers. Recompense as a way of
measuring success is arguably part of recognition. Of course it also has the
huge advantage of paying the bills. Signing with a major publisher gets my work out there and the money coming in. QED.

But is it that simple? I’ve met lots of authors who have had book deals which have fallen short of expectation, leaving them still waiting for the breakthrough moment. There are also rumblings from a number of acquaintances with very respectable deals about the money being less and the work on marketing and platform building taking much longer than they expected. And there’s the nub. Every publisher from the big six down asks authors to use social networks, build platforms arrange blog tours and book signings.  A contract with a publisher no longer means sitting back and waiting for them to sell the books. Aside from distribution to bookshops, most marketing is in the hands of the author. And big publishers will still make healthy advances, but probably only if you already have a huge public following or some other claim to fame.

Looking back over eight years I can also see I’ve achieved quite a lot already in the way of recognition (shortlistings, prizes, the odd publication) and while in
charge of a commercial golf blog, for a while I even had a small income from
writing. More importantly, partly as a result of work interests but mainly
because I think it’s fun, I have ended up already  building  a platform here, on Twitter and to a lesser extent on Facebook.

I think you can see where this is leading. I would still like the vindication of
a book deal – and the bigger the better. On the other hand, there are now many
more ways to skin the publishing cat. With the huge success of e-readers, e-publishing is becoming the norm, and in the e-publishing world, the line between commercial and self-publishing is increasingly fuzzy: new models are evolving all the time in which  author, agent and publisher may share or swap roles.

To sum up, the audience is out there, the  technology to reach it is readily available. The income might be modest, but it would be mine. The future, some might say, is in my own hands. So what exactly am I waiting for?

The book is out there …

Mrs Darcy coverIt’s barely a year since  Jonathan Pinnock came here to do a guest appearance, and look what’s happened! Not only has his blog serialisation of Mrs. Darcy versus the Aliens been snapped up by a new imprint of Salt Publishing, but it’s already in the shops and in a healthy position in WH Smith charts.

For those of you who don’t know Mrs. Darcy in this particular guise, do read an extract here (wet shirt alert!) which will get you in the mood for the book as a whole. As a bit of a ‘real’ Austen fan, I was doubtful about my stomach for the alien mash-up, but as soon as I tried out the original blog, I found myself laughing out loud – with more laughs to follow when I tracked down this truly silly (brush up your school French!) YouTube trailer. I’m now pleased I didn’t read the whole blog as I have an excellent excuse (though no excuse needed to support Fellow Writer)  to go out and buy the book, which I shall do any minute now.  I hope lots of you will do the same.  Don’t worry, an affection for Jane Austen can only increase the pleasure.

As I also had the good luck to bump into Jon in person (that’s very tall person as it happens) along with a number of other notable Tweeps at the Get Writing Conference, his moment of glory feels all the more personal. If you’d like to meet up with Jon in a more virtual way, his blog tour schedule is here, and there’s a cracking outline of what makes the book work on the Proxima blog.

So what more can I say? If the truth is out there, though not yet universally acknowledged, I think it pretty soon will be.

Get Writing 2: the pitch

Picture this. One room containing five (I think it was five) publishers, editors  or agents, each seated at a school desk.  At a distance of some 10 metres from them, five queues,  each containing ten jittery wannabees (apologies to anyone there who was way beyond wannabee status) making nervous jokes and mentally rehearsing what they might cram into three short minutes with their chosen  guru. As seventh in line, I had more time than most for the jitters and the jokes.

One big plus was an air of strict organisation by the conference marshalls who insisted everyone stay behind the start line, and made sure no one could over-run to the detriment of anyone else.  At each change over the orders were barked and the next contender moved up into starting position. By the time I was second from the front I started to remember those theme park rides where I queued happily for an hour (or more) only to baulk when the car taking me over the big drop pulled up alongside.

Scott Pack
Scott Pack

But the drop, when it came, was a gentle one.  ‘My’ publisher was charm itself and  made encouraging noises all the way through, although an excess of adrenalin made it unlikely I’d dry up.  In fact in my enthusiasm I completely missed the  ‘thirty second’ call  and had to be elbowed out by the next contender. 

Outcome? Okay, I have not been snapped up just yet, but I did have a prompt, courteous and  encouraging response to the material I left behind for my ‘date’  to peruse away from the maelstrom. And I do feel I gained a lot from the opportunity to have what was in effect a ‘dry run’ for other approaches I might make. I may not have a deal, but I’ve had a good confidence boost. Taking into account the cherished prize, not a bad return on a conference fee of £50.

To others considering this or similar ventures, it worked for me because it came at the right time. As I do final polishes to A Kettle of Fish, I realise I do have a grasp of the book as a whole and its likely markets. I also did several hours preparation for my 3 minutes, including prompt cards and a full dress rehearsal with my writers’ group, all of which was definitely worthwhile.

All in all, the pitch was a lot more fun than I expected, and maybe that’s the clue. Be serious about it, but keep a sense of humour.  Otherwise those three minutes might seem quite a long time!

For anyone who wants to know more about the day, take a look here.

A blog by any other name

When I read this post on the Futurebook blog recommending all authors get the social media habit, it simply confirmed my own beliefs that an aspiring novelist really has to get out there.  It came up again at a writers’ evening where a friend who has just signed a deal for a genre novel  told us that she is expected to maintain a blog and website of her own, despite benefitting from the marketing guns of a  major publisher.

As a blog convert, my own reaction is ‘why not?’ It’s easy enough to set up a basic blog, and even if it does eat into other writing time (note I don’t just say ‘writing time’, because a blog, and even Twitter, in case you haven’t noticed, does involve writing), there’s a lot of enjoyment to be obtained on all kinds of levels from joining online communities, not to mention the networking opportunities they throw up.

So, imagine my surprise when I picked up a Tweet about a blog post entitled You Don’t Have to Blog, Tweet, or Be on Facebook. Since my reaction to this is  ‘oh yes you do’ I decided to have a look, and whichever side of the fence you are on, you should have a look too. 

What Jane Friedman says, in effect, is that there is no need to follow one particular mode of online interraction, or to see the exercise as purely about self-promotion. The important thing is to use whichever medium you choose in the way that you want to, and to make connections with like-minded souls. But the message also comes across from both the post itself and the comments, that you should be doing something to create and foster such connections. Because as soon as you do, you also create an audience, in other words a readership. These are people who already like your ‘voice’ (whatever form it takes), who will give you support when they can , and from whom you will also pick up information, tips, and inspiration. Come the day when you sign that deal and your baby hits the shelves, they may even buy a copy. They will certainly tell their own friends and followers about it, who will tell their friends  …  

So what can you do if you’re a blog/twitter refusenik? Jane Friedman comes up with some novel alternatives (of which several are actually blogs!) I certainly know of bloggers who communicate almost solely in pictures, using a blog or a Flickr photostream. It’s also common to blog on a  topic  only partly linked to your work as an author.  It’s still a showcase for you.What matters is that you want to do it. While writing this post I discovered that local writer Nina Milton has set up a new blog in the persona of her latest heroine, an excellent way of honing the voice and getting in character. And of course there are those whose blogs (fictional or otherwise) have the potential to make it in the world of print or e-books.  Harper Collins (under the imprint of  The Friday Project) is one publisher actively looking for such material, and if you want to know what has happened to John Pinnock’s Mrs. Darcy versus The Aliens blog,  look here if you dare.

So to all you social media refuseniks, the question isn’t about what you don’t want to do, but what you are going to do instead. 

Mythbuster

As a writer, it’s easy to be seduced by those stories of instant success into thinking that there are short-cuts to the holy grail of getting published, and I have to thank people like Jane Smith (check out her  nice new website) and Sally Zigmond for reminding me that even in this techno whizzy age the traditional recipe of learning the craft and working at it very very hard (and probably for a long time) is still as much of a guarantee of success as anything else. But this week it’s hats off to Jim C. Hines, a U.S. fantasy writer, for doing some empirical research on how some commonly suggested factors may or may not influence the process. A mere précis would not do justice to Jim’s research (which he presents with great care and due attention to the possible flaws in his data) and I urge anyone who’s interested to read it for themselves, and so I’ll stick to highlighting a couple of surprises.

The first myth to be busted by Jim is when he discovers that only a minority of his sample went through the usual recommended route of short story publication. On reflection, perhaps this doesn’t entirely surprise me, if only because it is quite hard to get short stories published (or even noticed) unless you can stick to the strict rules of womag writing or catch the eye of the judges in big competitions. Neither would I take this as a reason to give up on short story writing as it’s an excellent way to learn how to write fiction. However, I’m heartened to feel that never having won the Bridport need not count against me when submitting a novel to an agent.

Another interesting question asked by Jim was how long authors had been writing before getting a novel published – and the average was 10 years – i.e. overnight success is at least as rare as I had always thought. However, although most authors had written 2 – 4 books before finding success, 58 authors in his sample of 246 had actually got a first novel published. Since I had always thought this was a very rare feat, I’m happy to find that it’s not impossible, and don’t feel quite so abashed at having just sent my own first attempt (languishing in a drawer for some time) off to a competition.

If you’d like to know the other myths challenged by Jim do check out the whole article. It is based mainly on U.S. writers of fantasy or genre fiction, but I have a sneaking suspicion his findings would largely be borne out in other genres and on this  side of the pond.

Mind over matter

Last week Nathan Bransford invited his blog followers to be agents for a day. The idea was similar to that of Pitch Parlour (one of my erstwhile haunts but sadly now in intermission) in allowing writers to judge their peers on the strength of a pitch letter and sample pages. (Most U.S. agents work from a pitch letter rather from a synopsis and partial manuscript as  is more usual in the country.) What I liked best about this exercise was NB’s observation after the event that while an agent’s view will always be subjective i.e. based on individual taste, that doesn’t mean it’s arbitrary i.e. lacking in any guiding principle. (These definitions/interpretations, by the way, are my own.)

As aspiring novelists, I think we would do well to remember that if our book isn’t getting picked, those that are selected have not only appealed to the agent in a personal way but also have the underlying characteristics that will ensure commercial success. Some of these will be relate to the overall quality of the writing (character, pace, plot) others may be particular elements thought likely to appeal to the current market (e.g. genres or settings regarded as in vogue). But if we despair of gaining attention, we must remind ourselves that ‘they have their reasons’. Instead of blaming them for doing their job, we should make sure that we are doing ours.

On this basis I’ve been doing some ‘revision’ helped by the authors of The Complete Handbook of Novel Writing, a book recommended some time ago by one of the Strictly Writing authors. This is not a straight text book but a compendium by a number of contributors. The chapters are not too long, and although I haven’t come across anything I didn’t already know, seeing it put in a new way is an excellent reminder of all the things I need to do to create a book worthy of professional attention.

In terms of personal response, I’m also reminded of how easy it is to get on the wrong side of a reader with some trivial detail. I was really looking forward to my current read and ready to lap up the historical background of a period that really interests me, but just as I plunged into the story, I stubbed my reading toe, as it were, on the hero’s  name (Alex)  which to my mind doesn’t fit a Victorian Scotsman. Because of it I’m struggling to take off a critical hat  and  simply go with the flow of the narrative.

So there we have it: a detail that could have been changed by an editor, but as a reader I have to put up with it.  And yes, this is entirely subjective !

A cheerful Wannabe (thanks to Jane)

Not sure how I have managed to ignore Jane Wenham-Jones’ Wannabe a Writer ? until now.  I suppose I felt I had read every book,  been on every course, and generally heard everything there is to hear about how to get published – without any of it having had the desired effect.  How could even Jane, whose sparky writing I enjoy in Writing Magazine and elsewhere, have anything new to say? (Doh, I forgot that it’s not what you say, it’s the way that you say it!)

Luckily I decided to buy the book  because it contains the entry form for a novel-writing competition, and when the package duly arrived (and after I had ripped out the form and thrust it into the envelope with my submission) I thought I should get my money’s worth by reading the damn thing.  Needless to say, Jane and her fellow contributors had me laughing straight away and realising what an old cynic I have become.
Have I learned anything new? Well, I have only dipped in, but I’ve already been inspired to (re-)rewrite my synopsis, and suddenly the desire to complete a novel (and the hours of apparently fruitless labour this entails) seems like a worthy if wacky occupation. And I am in good company!   

One of the encouraging things about Wannabe a Writer? is the elation (or even ecstasy) Jane clearly feels at having achieved her dream. Not so Michael Stephen Fuchs, whose work I don’t know but whom I discovered via the Macmillan New Writers’ blog. He has recently issued a warning to aspiring novelists that being published isn’t everything it’s cracked up to be. In fact, he makes it sound like absolute hell, and reading his tale of woe makes me feel doubly pleased to have heard Jane’s version.
(Of course, whatever the downsides are of success, I’d be happy to find out for myself!)