Tag Archives: Historical Fiction

Dancing for Uncle Joe

russian winter coverI was sent a copy of Daphne Kalotay’s Russian Winter some time ago and for some reason it languished on my shelf, not rejected but simply neglected, until a passing friend happened to mention she was stuck for something to read. Try this, I said, and tell me if it’s any good. Within a few days she said how much she was enjoying it and at our monthly reading group she was so clearly taken with it, I made a plea for ‘no spoilers’ and  started reading it straight away. I have to say this really is a gorgeous book and exactly the sort of thing I like.

It’s about three people all living in present-day Boston: Nina a ballet dancer who defected from Stalin’s Russia who has decided to auction off her stunning collection of jewellery; Drew, the young representative of the auction house handling the sale, and Grigori, an academic who’s life work has been the translation of the poems of Viktor Elsin, the husband Nina left behind in Moscow and who did not survive the Stalinist terror. But if Nina can rid herself of the jewels, the act of doing so sirs up searing memories. Grigori too, an adopted child still mourning the death of his wife, has never come to terms with the mystery of his Russian birth parents and the fact that Nina has always refused to acknowledge any connection to him. Through all three characters the story of Nina and her life with the Bolshoi Ballet under Stalin unfolds at just the right pace until a whole skein of false assumptions is unravelled and a new set of connections revealed.

What do I like about it? The narrative,  carried entirely by the main characters, is taught, but absorbing rather than gripping, allowing us plenty of time to see the lives of other characters like Grigori’s friend, the dissident poet Zoltan, Nina’s fellow dancer Polina who is prey to constant anxiety and fear, or Viktor’s aristocrat mother (a kind of white Russian Miss Haversham) whom he has to hide behind a plywood wall. The story has many layers but everything is germane to the themes of how  love and loyalty are compromised under a reign of terror.  And by the end I knew so much more about Stalinist Russia, the life of a ballerina and even amber jewellery.

It’s interesting to ask why I didn’t pick this book up sooner. I certainly think the title is bland, and the cover similarly conventional. Nothing about the appearnce of the book stands out, which goes to show how much these things count. Of course this is a conventional novel ,  but in a good way. It delivers in all it sets out to do and I found it entirely satisfying. Who could ask for more?

 

Turn of the Tide: Scottish history comes to life

Knowing this Scottish historical novel by Margaret Skea had  battled through the scrutiny of Authonomy authors and the Alan Titchmarsh People’s Novelist Competition, I was really keen to read it, but at first I was uncertain. The writing was polished and clearly backed up by detailed research but could I be gripped by this tale of warring  16th century lairds? More importantly (wine with supper not always conducive to concentration!) could I remember which side they were all on? The  dialogue also has a formality that feels authentic and distinctive but is occasionally a little hard to untangle. And so for a while I found myself making little critical notes as I went along, wondering if I would stick with it. But its appeal gradually crept up on me and by the end I loved it to bits.

Turn of the Tide coverFollowing a horrific massacre, the young King James of Scotland asks that two warring factions of Scottish gentry – Cunnighames and Montgomeries – should end their long-running feud.  By now the reader has already been introduced to sympathetic (and not so sympathetic) characters on each side and understands the truce will be fragile to say the least. The jockeying for position at court is fascinating, and there are great set pieces like the hunt arranged for the king by one faction in which the others are equally desperate to make the right impression.  This is very the human side of  history in which political affiliations turn on how much the king likes the gift of a poem or a favoured jewel and have huge consequences not just for the lairds but also for the women at home. It’s clear that the author has detailed knowledge of and empathy with them,  particularly Kate Munro, whose husband owes allegiance to the Cunninghame clan but is gradually drawn into friendship with the Montgomeries.  Munro frames the book, in at the initial kill and centre stage in the brilliant climax, all the more shocking as the conclusion of an otherwise measured tale.

The depth of research shines out in the details of costume, cookery, agriculture, childcare and the role of women, all of it throwing light on what has always been a murky and ill-understood period in my own mind and bringing the characters and their lives to shimmering life. This is a fascinating and engaging read with great visual effect. Bring on the sequel!

E-book and paperback from Capercaillie Books (whose picture can’t be copied – understandable but irritating!)

Dead Wood by Chris Longmuir

Dead Wood coverI’m not really a crime aficionado and read only the occasional detective story, but I met Chris Longmuir at the Love A Happy End event in June and I’ve been looking forward to her prize-winning Dead Wood ever since. Apart from anything else I’ve entered the Dundee Prize and  was keen to see the kind of book that had come out on top! And the book is set In Dundee too, a city I know only slightly, but anywhere north of the border starts with an advantage in my eyes. Would it go anywhere to challenging Rebus’ Edinburgh in the Scottish crime stakes?

I did have some qualms. Chris mentioned that some people find the book particularly dark, but although there are grisly scenes and disturbing glimpses into the mind of the murderer, there was nothing I felt was gratuitously nasty or prompted the revulsion I have occasionally felt with tartan noir, so no worries on that score.

The story centres on Kara, a young Mum who, after a mix-up involving a drugs deal, comes close to being the victim of a serial killer. During all this she has been forced to leave her kids home alone, and as a result they are taken into care. Her primary motivation throughout the book is to get them back, but she does manage to report  the killer’s activities to the local nick where we meet a hard-boiled detective struggling with a disintegrating private life. Sounds familiar? Yes, but this is no Rebus clone, because we also get to know a whole team of liaison officers and social workers dealing with the problems thrown up by Kara’s situation. The author has experience in this field,  making for an authentic picture of police work today, involving as it does case conferences as well as incident rooms.

In the same way, Dundee makes a great backdrop to events: unglamorous, gritty and with just a whiff of the sea, not to mention some outlandish characters, like the hooker who keeps snakes – (so bizarre I’m hoping there’s a real-life equivalent somewhere!)

There is a big cast of characters and an intricate plot. Somewhere in the middle I got a bit lost in the past history of Templeton Woods  but then everything clicked into place and it became clear that  the killer was not just on the loose but (trying not to give too much away!) very close indeed to the investigating team.

The closing chapters keep everything simmering at just the right temperature, and the ending, in terms of Kara’s future, hits just the right note. A great read with all the right ingredients, this will appeal to all crime fans and maybe a few more besides.

Chris writes mainly crime, but if you like historical sagas, her Salt-splashed Cradle  (e-book only) centred on a Victorian fishing community is well worth a look too.

There are no rules. But lots of decisions.

First draft, rough draft, dirty draft. You know where I’m coming from here. The thing is to write and write some more. It’s all new and in the words of the Director of Deliverance, ALL GOOD.

hugh bonneville
Hugh Bonneville ‘All Good’

Or is it? When do you go with the flow of a scene that’s just taken a surprising turn, and when do you rein in and say, hang on, this isn’t part of the plan? How much does it matter (as posted by Maria Smith) if you think your first chapter, the starting point of the whole thing, is wrong?

Well I’m not going to get stuck in the mire of plotting and pantsing, but I think there are some decisions that need to be made early on. Not because there is anything in a first draft that can’t be undone, but because some things are much harder to undo than others.

Last week I had a think about point of view – who is the main character, and/or how many do you need? (In the interim I have discovered someone who has twelve – yes twelve, his must be Love Actually territory!) But in fact if we decide we don’t need the inmost thoughts of the heroine’s sister-in-law (fascinating though they may be) or if we decide to cut her out altogether, it’s not the end of the world: a few scenes chopped, a few paragraphs rewritten, and maybe some reworking so that we see her, say, through the heroine’s eyes.  In Kettle I began with two MCs/POVs. Once the plot had cemented,  this was clearly not going to work.  But getting rid of  one was a lot less effort than I expected. The scenes could stand, they just needed some rejigging.

But there’s another kind of POV and that’s the grammar part (it might be syntax, do correct me if I’m wrong). i.e. will I write in first (I) or third person (he/she), mix it up, or go mad and attempt second (you). My first novel  was firmly in third person and never wanted to be anything else. But when Ailsa came long it all felt like an experiment. As a heroine she was a generation younger than me. I felt the need to get into her skin and I began in first person present tense. Well present tense was fun at first but hard to maintain.  I also had an inkling it might alienate readers and so I dropped it fairly early on. But first person stayed right to the end of the first complete draft, at which point I recalled all the advice I’d had from writers, agents, people trying to help and began to rewrite in third person. Trust me, this is not something to take on lightly. Since my heroine, obviously, was in every scene, pretty well every line had to be rewritten. The only solution was a new draft.   But although my new version had some merits (well I thought so) it somehow didn’t feel like what I had set out to do. So whad’ya know?   I threw over my own traces and changed it back to first person! I had saved the old version, but in trying to combine the two,  my proof-reader will tell you I made a bit of a mess.

On to the new Work in Progress, the first draft,  the all good scenario. But any WIP is in my book a bit of an experiment – will it stay the course? This time I had no desire to use first person, so that was a relief. But again that need to get some immediacy  in unfamiliar territory took over and I found myself  writing in present tense (quite ironic as it’s set in the 19th century!)

Now there are many fine novels written in present tense, some of which have fared pretty well, including Wolf Hall which I read round the time I started this particular novel. Maybe my choice of tense was simply a case of ‘interference’ from my reading.  But whatever the reason,  I wrote a good 15000 words in present tense before I stopped to question it and it was only when I returned after a lengthy writing break that I found myself ‘slipping’ into past tense, which on the face of it is a better place to be (Mantel, moi?)  And that’s where I was today when I looked at yesterday’s work and thought it lacked the intimacy I was trying to engender.….  So here we go again. I have some scenes in past tense and some in present. Yes, it can be changed, but is/was is like I/me/mine. It’s everywhere.

Now that the world has changed and we (or some of us) are no longer worried about writing conventions or the demands of those elusive agents, it’s easy to say ‘there are no rules’. But a few decisions early on can make a big difference.

hugh bonneville

Twenty Twelve. Classic.

If anyone else is a fan of the lovely Hugh, do visit his website which has a nice charity thing going on. Hope this small direction absolves me from having ‘repurposed’ any images.

Secret of the Sands

secret of the sands sara sheridanYou might remember that Secret of the Sands was the product of my Kindle download experiment of judging a book by its first chapter and I was in no way disappointed. This is a rattling good yarn with a fascinating setting – both historical and geographical – which is evoked in fabulous detail by the author Sara Sheridan.

I won’t summarise the plot, but it centres on Lieutenant Wellsted of the ship Palinurus, sent by the East India Company in 1833 to map areas of the Arabian Peninsula which is proving obstructive to trade between East and West. Wellsted has already submitted  a memoir of his travels to the publisher John Murray in London when two of his fellow officers, on an intelligence mission in the desert, are heard to have been captured by a local chieftain and he is sent off to rescue them. At the same time, a young Abyssinian girl Zena has been taken into slavery and ends up, along with the slavers who have possession of her, as part of Wellsted’s expedition.

Thus the ingredients for a romantic adventure fall into place. But along the way we get an intriguing account of society in Arabia as seen in the town of Muscat. In what is both a cross-roads and melting pot of cultures, an Arab agent learns English with an Irish accent, the English must accept slavery they have recently banned at home, and daily life involves constant negotiations around culture, class and caste as well as goods and money. The writer also bring to vivid life the sounds and sensations of a wealthy household, a naval ship or a Bedouin encampment with equal knowledge and skill.

I learned a great deal from this book (for instance that there was smallpox in coastal Arabia in this period) which also sent me running to an atlas to check the geography of an area I realised was all too vague in my mind. I also enjoyed the ripping yarn which evolves when the trip into the desert begins. My only quibble would be that the plot languished for a while as we were introduced to an array of characters, who were all interesting but who also made me impatient.  Drawn instantly to Zena, Jessop (the captured doctor) and Wellsted himself (for me the ‘anchors’ of the story) I would have been happy for events and other people to have emerged through their eyes and was slightly frustrated at having to spend time with, for instance,  the captain and crew of the Palinurus.

The book is of course inspired by the letters and journals of Wellsted, and if I’d been reading in print I might well have skipped ahead to the author’s historical notes which do add greatly to the interest. However the e-book is less tempting in this respect and so I simply dived into the story and left the facts until the end, which for a work of fiction is no doubt as it should be.

I would certainly recommend this for anyone who likes historical novels, or perhaps even more so to anyone who  might not usually choose this genre. I think they would be both surprised and impressed, and I myself will definitely be looking out for Sara Sheridan’s other books.

Since finishing Secret of the Sands I have coincidentally been
planning planned a trip to the Middle East and am grateful for the insight into its history. A final request? A map of Wellsted’s expedition (unless I have missed it) – in print or on the author’s website- would add the finishing touch to my education!

 

Numbers Game

National Railway Museum

National Railway Museum

A trip to York has been an excellent excuse to neglect Authonomy where The Water’s Edge is now sinking down the rankings. And if I am ever to get on with my rewrite project I’m afraid that sink it must. Even maintaining its current position requires too much effort in finding and swapping reads. But I have made some good writing friends on Authonomy and hope I’ll catch up with them when the novel is put back together again. (Ali, Jane, Diana, Elinor, Lellie and Sandrine – this means you!)

 Ironically, as I withdraw from the fray, I am just starting to understand some aspects of how the ranking system works. It turns out that points allocated to a book when it’s backed vary according to the ‘reviewer rank’ of the backer. Reviewer points are allocated depending on the progress of a book after you have backed it, i.e. backing a ‘best seller’ book  will do little for your own reviewer ranking; backing an ‘unknown’ that subsequently shoots up the charts will boost your own rank – and consequently makes you a more effective backer of other books. Very cunning, methinks, and does something to mitigate the idea that it’s purely a numbers game.

 If anyone is still paying attention, I can tell you that The Water’s Edge has been backed by three ‘top reviewers’ so far. More perplexing is that while my book rank is hovering just outside 600, my reviewer rank is a tidy 375.   Okay, I think it is a numbers game after all. Or does this mean I should give up writing and become a professional editor?  

 While ignoring my read/review duties I also found a useful article on writing historical novels, which makes a clear statement that the story, rather than the research, is the thing to get right So all that research, however useful, is just a way of putting off the inevitable.  

 I think I knew that really.

Middle of the Road

My Library Thing widget should update soon to show I’ve been on a reading fest – three books in three days is a lot for me! – and only happened because a neck problem has kept me off the golf-course and also the P.C. So far this week I have clocked up  a racy historical novel, a contemporary family story and a fictional biography (which I haven’t yet finished).

How would I summarise my literary tastes? Not sure, but I was disconcerted to see Monica Ali described in the Telegraph as ‘middle-brow’, as if that were a bad thing.  I haven’t read her latest books but I thoroughy enjoyed Brick Lane and I woud say it is roughly representative of a lot of what I read. And what I read is probaby what I aspire to in my writing.  So that makes me middle-brow too. But who wants to be low-brow writer (poor or formulaic writing?) and who would lay caim to high-brow (obscure and  with a limited market?) The whole ‘brow’ idea is clearly a lazy shorthand which lets us put someone down without explaining our real reasons. If I have to choose one, it’s still going to be the  middle ground.

The Great Lover by Jill Dawson If for ‘high-brow’ we can read ‘literary’, my current read probably does fall in that category. Jill Dawson’s ”The Great Lover’  is about Rupert Brooke.  I chose it as an example of historical fiction that deals with a real (and not too distant) figure – something I’m about to attempt myself. I like the way it uses his maid at Grantchester (not just a servant but also the keeper of the honey bees) as the second narrator. As such it’s a good example of the technique of  ‘fictional minor character’ as a vehicle for historical fiction, something I’m thinking about too. In this case Brooke himself also has a voice which is convincing but so far less compelling – perhaps the problem with a hero who is, as he should be, a man of light and shade, i.e. he carries a lot of the narrative but I’m not sure I like him! Still it’s early days, and the beautifully evoked atmosphere (smell those scones!)  is beginning to pull me in.